Visit David Rutt's column >>

DAVID RUTTHome Page

Tall. Likes brass bands.
Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 24; Links Seeded: 635
Member Since: 2/2006Last Seen: 10/21/2009

Not the gaffer, but the gaffee

advertisement

Forget about the gaffe, it's the media mindset that makes so much of gaffes that is the real issue, says Clive James.

Step forward anyone who has never made a gaffe. But that very instruction would be a gaffe if you delivered it to an audience of people in wheelchairs.

You would be in the same verbal slide-area as President Bush, who instructed a press correspondent to stop hiding behind his dark glasses, and it turned out that the correspondent was legally blind. But really President Bush is in the same verbal slide-area as us. We all make gaffes when speaking impromptu, and the only remarkable thing is that we don't do it more often.

The American presidential election is still six months away and judging from the current coverage you would think that the outcome was going to be decided by gaffes. In the mini-election still being fought out between the Democrat contenders, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, most of the news between contests in the individual states is provided by whether or not either candidate has made a gaffe lately.

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
0.5
{"commentId":1788090,"authorDomain":"rutty"}

If verbal bumbling seems to be more prevalent all the time, it is mainly because the newspapers now miss nothing. Until the end of WWII, when tape recorders arrived, reporters would neaten up what they heard when they wrote it down in shorthand.

But President Eisenhower was already a victim of press precision when he was not yet even a candidate. He was still commander of Allied Forces in Europe when he addressed his troops thus: "Do not needlessly endanger your lives until I give you the signal."

These days you can't get anything past the press, who seem more intent on making our public figures look like idiots (as amusing as that is sometimes) than in finding out what our politicians actually mean in their speeches.

Clive James is one of my favourite writers. I like what he's saying here

{"commentId":1788090,"threadId":"262748","contentId":"1481249","authorDomain":"rutty"}
    Reply#1 - Sun May 11, 2008 8:24 AM EDT
    {"canLink":false,"threadId":"262748","isPrivate":false}
    Leave a Comment:
    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
    {"threadId":"262748","contentId":"1481249"}
    Start TrackingStart Tracking
    Stop TrackingStop Tracking